In this post, we’ll examine the making of a reproduction 19th century door casing using traditional techniques and hand tools. The northern Vermont home we’re working in dates from the 1820s. It is a small farmhouse built in what architectural historians might call “vernacular” style, meaning a building derived from local traditions and materials. Functionality dominated the design decisions that went into creating these type of buildings, as opposed to fashion and current high style, though they too had their place.
The woodwork in any hand-built house is always an ideal place to see these design decisions played out in wood and nails. The carpenters that built this early American home were limited to local materials, tools and time when finishing out the interior, and decided on using a simple quirk edge bead detail to dress up the flat planed trim. On the doorways, the bead ran around in the inner edge of 4″ wide pine trim. This quick and simple detail could be made on site, and it provided a crisp shadow line on the trim while also preventing splintering of the exposed edge.
The trim boards were sawed to dimension then their faces planed smooth with a jack plane. These medium-sized planes of 12-15″ in length were made of beech wood in the 1820s and featured a rounded iron or cutting blade for efficient and rapid removal of wood. The quirk bead was then applied to the board edge with a molding plane. These narrow, wood-bodied planes hold irons specially shaped to cut certain profiles from beads to rounds to window muntins. The trim boards were then cut to fit the door and window frames and applied with long cut nails.
This restoration of the formal parlor to its 1820s appearance is an ongoing project that has involved removal of 150+ years of building strata to uncover what remained of the original trimwork. We’ll focus on other aspects of this work in upcoming posts, but let’s delve into the recreation of some door casings to replace originals that, unfortunately, did not survive 185 years of service.
For the new casings, I’ve chosen rough-cut poplar. It’s easy to tool and shape, resists splintering, is relatively clear and knot-free, and also fairly priced. By starting with rough-cut lumber I’m able to match the thickness of the original trim boards, which is 1-full inch. Not 7/8″. Not 3/4″. No. It’s a whole damn inch. And the difference between that old inch and the new “inch”, by which dimensional lumber is sold, makes all the difference. This is one of the reasons old woodwork is so much more striking and dynamic than fresh trim from the Home Depot. This difference is exactly what separates a preservation carpenter from Joe handyman swinging a hammer in your old home. But I digress.
After trimming the rough boards to width, I used a Stanley jack plane with a rounded iron to smooth the faces. This is probably one of my favorite activities, planing a smooth board and watching curl after curl of wood fly from the mouth of the plane. When finished, the plane leaves a slightly rippled appearance to the boards. These ripples, which can be seen under many layers of paint, are often the hallmark of historic woodwork in many old houses made by hand. I then applied the quirk bead to the board edge using a 19th century beading plane selected to perfectly match the dimensions of the original beading plane.
The original door casings are cut in such a way that the top piece nests between the two uprights. To recreate this I have to shave the edge bead off at 45 degrees on the uprights, and cut the bead off both ends of the top piece where it meets the uprights. Easier seen in photographs than explained, this was done using a wood chisel and angle guide clamped to the trim board. The uprights were cut and installed first to provide measurements for the top piece, which was then cut and trimmed to fit. I attached the casings with set finish nails, and when filled and sanded smooth, these will become invisible under paint.
While taking the time to finish a door by hand from rough stock in this manner is labor intensive, in a faithful restoration process recreation is just as valid a goal as product replication. In fact, one could argue that the two are inseparable. Just as the electric miter saw marks and wire finish nails give away the modern concessions I made in this trim project, the wood carries the mark of its maker and cannot tell a lie.























